Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. For more information on this project, contact Brande Kempf, PACE EH Coordinator, or Bill Sirmans, Environmental Health Director at the Santa Rosa County Health Department.
SANTA ROSA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
July-August 2006 PACE EH Progress Report
The months of July and August have been fast passed and a bit
challenging for the Santa Rosa County PACE program. In July a total of 4
CEHAT meetings were held. Committee members devised a health survey and
an air pollution log in cooperation with the health department. The main
concern of our CEHAT members is the permit for the landfill.
Specifically the permit states that objectionable odor is not
permitted. Residents are concerned that FDEP continues to allow
operation while violating their permit based on the statement above. The
residents state that they can not breathe at night when the humidity
settles, they have duck taped their doors and windows, nor can they turn
on their air conditioners. Members of the CEHAT and the PACE coordinator
traveled door to door distributing air pollution logs with return
addressed stamped envelopes. The health surveys were filled out on site
to insure they were received in a timely manor. It was then that the
health department put together an analysis of symptoms and complaints in
an unscientific chart. Over 200 surveys were obtained with amazing
results. Our results are below.
Holley-Navarre PACE Environmental Health Survey, Conducted June-July,
2006
- 115 completed surveys were analyzed. The results represented
about 240 individuals.
- Respondents average number of years living in area, 18 years
- Average age of respondents, 47 years
- Home-distance from Coyote Landfill
- Less than ¼ mile = 43 completed surveys + 39 children
- ¼ mile to 1 mile = 59 completed surveys + 38 children
- Over 1 mile or not indicated = 13 completed surveys + 6
children
- All report smelling odors from the landfill.
- All have public water available, but some also have wells and
report using them for drinking water.
- Symptoms asked about and number of complaints included the
following:
- coughing and/or congestion - 86
- burning eyes - 84
- breathing difficulty/respiratory issues - 80
- burning or scratchy throat - 77
- headaches - 76
- fatigue/restlessness - 74
- sleeplessness - 68
- sneezing problems - 66
- upset stomach - 61
- nose burning/bleeding - 58
- eyesight problems - 54
- dizziness - 46
- inability to concentrate - 43
- vocal problems - 39
- nervousness - 37
- feelings of confusion - 35
- ringing in ears - 14
- other - 8
| Home Distance from Landfill |
# Respondents |
Number of Symptoms Reported |
Average |
| Under ¼ mile |
43 |
454 |
10.6 |
| Over ¼ to 1 mile |
59 |
471 |
8.0 |
| Over 1 mile + Not Available |
13 |
81 |
6.2 |
Most of the persons who reported symptoms had onset of symptoms
after the October and November, 2005, fires at the Landfill; and the
symptoms persist.
PACE-EH continues to have meetings through out the months of July and
August. Our focus is now to determine where our next step with our
program. Through the PACE-EH program, Brande applied for a $25,000 grant
at the beginning of July 2006 but at the end of the month we had heard
nothing regarding the status.
At our July 24th meeting it was determined that we proceed to the County
Commissioners meeting. We determined as a CEHA Team we would present our
survey findings along with information members had studied with regards
to landfills and possible toxins in the environment.
On August 7, 2006 we presented our project to the County Commissioners
asking for funding to further study the Air, Water and Health of the
residents surrounding the Coyote Landfill. CEHAT members give
testimonials to their quality of life or lack there of in addition to
their research on finding and suggesting an outside consultant coming in
to interpret results from air monitors.
On August 9, 2006 SRCHD & PACE-EH received word that we were awarded our
$25,000 grant from CEHAB.
On August 10, 2006 Commissioners criticized FDEP for not stepping up to
the plate but they unanimously agreed to fund the project $15,000 with
an additional money approved if necessary. The owners of Coyote Landfill
also offered to front $5,000 for the studies as well. Coyote Landfill
manager John Warren pointed out the fact that there were possibly other
areas of concern that needed to be looked at as well and maintained that
Coyote Landfill follows strict FDEP guidelines. He also stated that they
are here to work with the citizens of Holley-Navarre. Wow, what a busy
week $45,000 all at one time!
The Health Department will be utilizing the County Commissioners &
Landfill funds for air quality sampling as well as hydrogen sulfide
exposure testing on local residents. There is also a need to test
residential irrigation wells to determine if there are additional areas
being contaminated.
Since our County Commissioner meeting FDEP has fined Coyote Landfill
stating that they were in violation of environmental laws for operating
a construction and demolition debris disposal facility where open
burning emitted objectionable smoke and odor and where debris was in
contact with water and there was a failure to maintain a small working
face and provide weekly cover.
Additional meetings are forth coming in the next few weeks with the
county manager, grant administrator, Santa Rosa County Health Department
and CEHAT members. We will be distributing additional flyers as
necessary along with determining a protocol that will be used for
further studies though out the PACE process.
2. Work Plan and Process Update
|
| PACE-EH Tasks |
Action |
Outcome |
Target Date |
| Task 1:
Determine Community Capacity |
Specific resources,
skills and capacities needed for the project have been
identified. New working relationships with other agencies,
businesses and organizations have been formed. Current
collaboration possibilities have been broadened. Expressed
community concerns have made this project a timely venture. |
Completed |
|
| Potential strengths
and weaknesses of community outlined. |
May 25, 2006 |
|
| First community
meeting conducted. |
|
|
| Task 2:
Define and Characterize the Community |
Identify political,
social, economic and cultural systems of community |
Completed, June 6, 2006 |
|
| Research additional
stakeholders that need to be engaged in this project. |
Ongoing |
|
| Task 3:
Assemble Community Health Environmental Team |
Community
Environmental Health Assessment Team Meeting |
|
|
| o Clarify
expectations of team |
Completed |
|
| o Vision
Formation |
Ongoing |
|
| o Develop
governing and decision-making structure, and ground rules |
Ongoing |
|
| o Describe
scope of environmental health issues to address |
Ongoing |
|
| o Encourage and
recruit community and other organization involvement |
Ongoing |
|
| Task 4:
Define the Goals, Objectives, and Scope of the Assessment |
Geographic/Topical
scope |
June 13, 2006 |
|
| Expected outcomes
and decisions of process |
Ongoing |
|
| Task 5:
Generate Environmental Health Issue List |
Data collection of
community concerns |
Completed |
|
| Create manageable
list |
| Evaluate and select
data-gathering methods |
| Task 6:
Systems Framework Analysis |
Understanding the
framework |
Pending |
08/29/06 |
| Mapping process -
Linking health of the community and health of the environment |
| Task 7:
Develop Locally Appropriate Indicators |
Develop list of
potential indicators |
Pending |
TBD |
| Identify key
indicators based on selected criteria |
| Task 8:
Select Standards |
Identify externally
driven standards |
Pending |
TBD |
| Agree upon locally
appropriate standards |
| Task 9:
Create Issue Profiles |
Adopt a standardized
format for organizing information |
Pending |
TBD |
| Gather information |
| Collect data for
locally developed indicators |
| Develop a summary
statement |
| Task 10: Rank
Environmental Health Issues |
Determine the
biggest/most serious problems in community |
Completed |
6/24/06 |
| Task 11:
Set Priorities for Action |
Determine local
priority-setting criteria |
Pending |
10/01/06 |
| Select priorities |
| Task 12:
Develop an Action Plan |
Develop goals and
objectives |
Pending |
TBD |
| Identify community
assets and barriers |
| Develop timeframe |
| Determine level of
success |
| Task 13:
Evaluate progress and Plan for the future |
Agree on questions
to be answered by the evaluation |
Pending |
TBD |
| Evaluate the success
of the evaluation process |
Pending |
TBD |
| Prepare for
community-based environmental health assessment activities |
Pending |
TBD |
3. Outstanding Issues/Concerns
|
Some of the difficult issues that have been presented for this
particular project were getting across to the CEHAT members that there
was a process we needed to follow. And the fact that the county health
department did not have funds to address these issues in the
environment, which was why PACE-EH was perfect for this community.
Working with other agencies has been challenging due to the fact its
difficult in the beginning to know what agency should be involved.
However, we now know more of who need to be involved.
Media! That is a challenge in itself. Many of our articles never mention
the PACE program. We had several publications at the beginning but since
more legal actions have been taken by the residents the media has
forgotten about PACE. Even though I have sent several updates to local
media outlets, they have chosen not to include the purpose of PACE and
had it not been for PACE-EH that this may not have gotten to this point.
As for addressing this issue, it is not known at this time how we are
going to try to steer the media. Its important for them to understand
that SRCHD does not support legal actions. We are still working closely
with the residents and the medical staff to help address these issues
further.
Additional goals for future months are to continue the pursuit of
finding an agency that can support our need for air quality testing and
interpretation of data once it is collected. We are working with the
county manager and commissioners to determine the best path for the
community. SRCHD will also be working on researching and testing area
irrigation wells. Other testing that may be done are those tests for
animals. Many residents feel their livestock and pets are being affected
by the toxins as well. Final challenges are those that involve human
testing. SRCHD is working on developing protocols in accordance to state
guidelines. Human testing will be the final process of this program.
On a positive note, we have now gotten the attention of local government
officials. We are a constant present in the community and are developing
trusting ties among the residents. The attention is only the beginning.
Commissioners are very passionate with regards to helping the community.
The County Commissioners are considering changing landfill regulations
regarding in Santa Rosa County. They have also voted on a moratorium
regarding landfills in Santa Rosa County. There has also been mention of
bring this attention to the state level. Insuring other neighborhoods do
not have to endure the types of environmental dangers that are
surrounding landfills. PACE-EH will continue to strengthen the
grassroots of the community by involving all members of local and
regional governments. Our CEHAB grant will allow us to utilize the
monies awarded to give back to the community. This will not only create
a strengthened Holley-Navarre community but also build upon community
outreach programs involving the health department in the future.
June,
2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
Media Coverage
(All files are pdf <1mb and open in a new window)
January 25, 2007 -
Santa Rosa
proposes landfill reforms(pdf,1mb) 
January 18, 2007 -
Coyote Landfill
to be monitored
(pdf,1mb) 
December 10, 2006 -
Landfill company
under fire across panhandle
(pdf,1mb) 
December 10, 2006 -
Freeport landfill
continues dumping despite revoked permit
(pdf,1mb) 
September 15, 2006 -
Officials ban
new debris at landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
August 31, 2006 -
Navarre
residents file suit against Coyote Landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
August 24, 2006 -
Residents file
lawsuit against landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
August 23, 2006 -
Editorial: Area
landfill problems being discovered too late
(pdf,1mb) 
August 23, 2006 -
Residents want
landfill 'fixed'
(pdf,1mb) 
August 22, 2006 -
Lawsuit filed
against Coyote Landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
August 17, 2006 -
Landfill
causing health concerns
(pdf,1mb) 
August 11, 2006 -
Santa Rosa
health study money OK'd
(pdf,1mb) 
August 8, 2006 -
Residents seek
funds for tests of landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
July 28, 2006 -
Landfill
neighbors complain of illnesses
(pdf,1mb) 
July 16, 2006 -
Coyote Landfill
draws fire: Residents complaining about smells, illness they say the
dump site caused
(pdf,1mb) 
June 15, 2006 -
Landfill
controversy prompts emotional citizens meetings
(pdf,1mb) 
June 1, 2006 -
Health Program
to tackle Coyote Landfill
(pdf,1mb) 
|